err..PLAINSPEAK just for you and you and YOU..

The Anti-Seducer

“Seducers draw you in by the focused, individualized attention they pay to you. Anti-seducers are the opposite: insecure, self-absorbed, and unable to grasp the psychology of another person. They literally repel. Anti-seducers have no self-awareness, and never realize when they are pestering, imposing, talking too much. Root out anti-seductive qualities in yourself, and recognize them in others – there is no pleasure or profit in dealing with the Anti-Seducer. “

~ The Art of Seduction, Robert Greene

U huh *nods*, I have the above book and I follow his blog http://www.powerseductionandwar.com/index.phtml recently he updated about his latest book collaboration with 50 Cents entitled ‘The 50th Law’. Which I think will be very interesting. More on that on another time. AFTER i add that to my collection. I think zeemonkey would like that book cosh he idolizes 50 cents :p

So yes! Anywho!!! Yes you!!! Che. Anyhowdy *pointspointsJABJAB* I lent you the book (because i believe caring is sharing) because you had issues about relationships and am restarting your engines yet again to play the field. Who doesn’t have issues right? And since you are one of those few who actually read I lent you the above book. Maybe in hopes we could prolong by relating from stuff read. Intresting nuggets could be found in relation and contribute more to our conversations during lepak sessions constructively. Not that I am trying to set up a bookclub or anything but SINCEEEEEEEEEEEEE you told me you read…so read lar!

but what pisses me off or rather really really annoys me is how you try to use the very same laws and try them on me?! or maybe i am flattering myself too much here and cannot tell when you're just being your charming self? *ughhhhhhhhhhhh* but! but! BUT!!! i am using the very same LAW above (bold and highlighted somemore) to hint to you that AM not INTRESTED. and the law clearly states that...........

..."THERE IS NO PLEASURE OR PROFIT IN DEALING WITH TEH ANTI SEDUCER"

in proof!

1) i talk to you about other gals that you tell me about and advise you about how to deal with them right?
2) we always go out in a group right? and so okay we did spend SOME dinners and time ALONE but NO..i do not remember exchange of bodily fluids in *ahems* compromising ways
3) what about when I actually TOLD you off straight EXACTLY what i expect from you and US..

which is :-

thank you che. anyhowdy for being there for me when i am hungry and need someone to have dinner with. also the times you helped babysit the terrors when i am downright penniless and broke to bring them around. then for all the gerek kakis you introduced to me who happen to be very cool and great peeps! and how can i forget our conversations and times where random ad naseum just ranckles us silly and throw both of us out of reality huh? OITS!!! i thought you KNEW i am MOST comfortable with guys?! from waaaaaaaaaaaaay back inschool somemore!

don't you agree that with all above and major HINTS in speech and all that i fancy myself a bloke too? *gahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh* and don't give me the crap about guys and gals cannot be buddies lar (maybe some peeps can't handle this BUT we are talking about me here). AND never tell me puhleaseeeeeeeeeeeee that i'm giving you the i-am-playing-hard-to-get thingy with you hor! i am no sweet young thing or seductress that you make me to be??? NOTE: although i might just use this ploy when situation demands that i do. still! i digress!!!! and reiterate! am NOT am NOT! am NOT! *hentak-hentak kaki*

so hopefully i do NOT have to hurt you more than i should bro. it will be so downright hellish for me to bear the guilt man and how can it be fair when all i did is to be myself? :( so cut me some slack will ya and save me from the charming bull that you dish out. seriously bro....gua takbley angkat ah. macam nak pitam jer hehehe...otey otey...lets take today's skirmish ehk? where i did ask if you could buy me a pack of handrolling tobacco from over the causeway. i know its with you and you tell me you do not feel good about keeping it too long with you. apprently you are afraid that you might 'cukai' or go ahead and help yourself to some. i replied with no worries and take some if you like. i don't mind since payday is already around the corner *kaching!* so i'm pretty safe for now lar. you then replied in all seriousness how its 'amanah' (a promise) lar and its a heavy responsibilty lar with serious repercussions if not kept bla bla bla and what not...

and gua macam nak hantok jer kepala lu tau!! kalau gua da cakap boleh..dipersilakan dan go AHEAD and segala macam gua tak lokek lar geng peh replies. aper yang lu nak takot kena sambar petir or kena telan bumi nie??? tak paham arh! so jangan nak step alim-alim dan saya lar jejaka yang kamu idam-idamkan. pasal err...hampeh gua tak PERASAAN ler.

so again..please ehk...save your righteousness and charming ploys (very effective i must say) for those who will actually return your advances lar. it will save you heartache and also add on to your self esteem right? why why whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy do you want to go with an ANTI-SEDUCER as i have been? or must i stop everything at once so we can avoid misunderstandings?

peh funtart lar mat! menyirap ah darah gua tulis entry nie...pasal entah-entah GUA yang kasik lu SIGNALS ehk? eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

TOBAT ah!

say sane,
jahatamyemeelea

ps: bad bad bad monday! *terbalekkantoilet*